xyamius 2-20-2011 05:26 PM
Make It possible to Abandon CitiesIt would be nice to be able to abandon cities due to sometimes you start one and then find that the build was not needed or would pref a different resource set up.
yotie8103 2-20-2011 07:46 PM
I believe that this would off set the point of the game, people that get sent artillery would be able to just get rid of the castle that is being destroyed and just take over another castle. It is a good idea but it would also screw the game up even more than it already is.
brb1991 2-21-2011 03:33 AM
Yes, No and Other....
I understand why they dont allow players to delete an account or castle but a do over would be nice. I think it should be a function of rank or civ. Below a certain noobie level you can delete castes and after that a huge card is required. Perhaps with 1.6 there is a good spot to allow it now. I dont remember and dont care to look what the rank was but 4 castles can delete and start over but when you evolve to the next step your stuck.
The npc idea has been suggested many many times and was shot down by ex evo players but they are not here anymore, so it might be time to bring it up again. They already put them in oases, why not inactives?
I might come back for this turd version if they made npc castles.
xyamius 2-21-2011 12:09 PM
I can understand why the evo player sad no due to all the horrible memories of the skilled players using them as ways to prevent porting and building. Not to mention you could build a huge farm network and just sit and build and never have to attack another person.
Big difference between evo and lords though is that in lords you can only have 1 of each type of building for troops vs in evo you have no limit. Evo mass farms was nice since you could get 20 troop centers running and farm to keep them going 24-7 in lords once your get your fields to about lvl 12-13 you can do that with just 3 oasis's and keep building without needing to farm.
So there is a huge difference between to two in terms of what being able to abandon cities would do to lords vs what happened in evo.
Things that would be new if you could abandon are being able to drop a city that is being hit heavy, the ability to build cities to use for quick hitting and then pull out and abandon, building a farm or two for an alliance member that stuck in bfe and is struggling.
In short it would be rewarding the people who play more and give a few more tactical options for people to use.
StormRuler 5-13-2011 02:35 AM
That would help a new person when they goof building a city where they dont want it and open the slot in manor/palace.
SanPedRobert 7-23-2011 01:15 PM
Who builds new cities anymore? It takes forever, so the only option is to take over another castle. If the player abandoned a castle just rebuild, it would keep that new castle out of play for months.
I like the idea of NPC cities that can't then be conquered and take on the attributes of the resource structure, but they have to be then massive troop cities so they aren't just easy farms. Make it cost something to abandon.